Loss of Freedom


Dear fellow Americans,

After watching Tucker Carlson’s April 26th, 2017 episode, I decided that this needs to be said.  American freedom is in grave danger. When our young college students do not believe in the same values that we have grown to love and cherish, we risk losing our freedom when these students grow up and enter the working force.  These young folks will be our lawmakers, our lawyers, our judges, our policemen, our doctors, our teachers, our politicians, and our professors.  These young folks will be making decisions based on their inherent liberal values, values which condone the obstruction of any and all speech that does not match their ideology.  These values also include using violence to enforce this obstruction and to achieve their political objectives.

America, we are in danger of becoming a fascist country due to this intolerance.    I believe, though, that we can prepare to fight back against this fanatical, destructive, liberal ideology.  Each and every one of you who loves this country and takes our country’s true values to heart has the moral obligation to teach your children and grandchildren the truth about free speech.  Children need to study the constitution.  Children need to hear that their views are valid and should not be suppressed because someone does not agree with them.  As parents, grandparents, and caregivers, it necessary that we instill these values into our young ones so that they have the power and tools to undo the destruction that the current liberal young folks are wreaking on this country.

Please, do not rely on the school system to teach your children an objective view of how our government, our constitution, and how our country in general operates.   This needs to be done by YOU and only you.  If you do not have a copy of the constitution in your household, please obtain a copy.  Begin teaching your children and grandchildren those key values that helped shape America.  And most definitely, sleep with one eye open when you send your children to school and college.

Have open and honest discussions with your children.  Allow them to tell you what is discussed in school and among friends.  Build a good relationship with them so that they will come to you when someone is suppressing their rights, and give them the tool of facts and truth so that they can ultimately defend themselves if you are not available.   I understand that we have built a work based society and time is a factor, but all it takes is a few minutes every night before bed to explain to your children the concept of true freedom and to explain how our government works.

If we, as Americans, lose our ability to express ourselves freely, we will inevitably lose freedom itself.  It will only be a matter of time before the rest of our lives are dictated and controlled.  NOW is the time to stop this pattern of self-destruction by TEACHING YOUR CHILDREN about true civil liberty.  We need to raise Americans to fight back against the fascist regime of liberal thought that suppresses each and every American that dares to disagree.  It begins with our youth, and we are going to need strong, intelligent youth to go against the modern liberal ideology that is destroying America one sentence at a time.  Take heed Americans, we are already in a civil war and our freedom is at stake.   Please take this seriously and pledge that you will teach your children the truth.  Our future depends on it.

Read More

On the Brink of War


You’ve read the words of Razimus and some of you, like I, see that the Habers confessed to perpetrating a time travel hoax.   That confession is what lead me to believe that John Titor is not real, but I have something else for you to consider.  Perhaps the entire Titor story was made up, but what if someone contacted the Habers to give them information about our future and they used the Titor story to get the information out there?

This would imply a myriad of other time travel possibilities. Many questions would come up. For example, did a real time traveler contact Morey Haber? Why did he choose Morey? Was it because of his computer expertise? Why didn’t the nuclear war happen in 2015? Was it code for something else or does the divergence excuse apply to this situation? There are so many new questions to ponder if you delete Titor out of the equation and insert someone new. After all, how did Morey do such a great job predicting our future? Did he simply have a talent for guessing our future based on history and politics or was he given information to pass on to us?

All politics and bipartisan views aside, we undoubtedly are on the brink of nuclear war with North Korea. One, very eerily, cannot escape the words of Morey’s Titor and his mention of nuclear war. And we also have books like Alas, Babylon that seem to mirror events that are occuring in 2017. We have movies predicting presidents and national disasters. Something is going on and SOMEONE, whether it is one or more than one person, is sending us messages from the future. Perhaps it isn’t “John Titor” per se, but I think it is crystal clear that we are being warned. The evidence is out there. Books. Movies.

Am I afraid of nuclear war? No. After battling cancer and winning, nothing scares me. The end of the world as we know it only confirms, to me, that God is real and that there is an after life. So, I will not fear all these messages we have been given. After all, if “they” are able to send us these messages then perhaps “we” are capable of making changes to prevent disaster from striking. I will give you an example. In a previous article and video, I mentioned that a 4/11 event was predicted sometime during the Donald Trump presidency. It did not happen this year. I did warn the president, FBI, Homeland, and DOD, however. Did I help prevent a 4/11 disaster? We will never know.

Take heed but do not fear. Prepare, but do not panic. Be ready to fight for your freedom and stand together as ONE people instead of segregating ourselves. We will need to defend our families and neighbors and the only way to do that will be to put aside our political differences and step up to the plate once and for all. We CAN stop this nuclear war if we put our heads together and think without blame and without hating our president. This is a sitatuion that cannot be pinned down to one man. The situation with North Korea has been building up for many years. So, simply sleep with one eye open, be vigilant, and stop hating. It will be much easier to fight back that way.

Read More

John Titor Solved


If I remember correctly, and believe me, with my aging brain remembering doesn’t always come as easy as it use to, I’ve been studying John Titor since 2008. I’ve tried to track him down, ignoring key people in the saga as well ending up hitting some brick walls, or dead ends as they are usually called.  I just didn’t put the elbow grease into the effort, and was caught up in the story itself. After all, the John Titor story is fascinating and creative and it has entertained hundreds of people for over 15 years.

I ran into a guy named Razimus, and at first I was very skeptical of his claim that he solved John Titor with nothing but handwriting analysis. To me, it seemed something was missing and I couldn’t help but think that many people could write in the same style. I also pondered the fact that someone else did the writing for Titor. Could Morey Haber have written FOR John Titor? It’s possible, but what are the odds that an entire family would be involved with John Titor himself? If John were real, he would only be dealing with the lawyer, Larry Haber, and the family members would have no need to intervene with this endeavor because Larry assumably had nothing but a professional relationship with Titor.

When you watch this video by Razimus of Hoax Hunter, you will see that every single Haber brother and even a son/nephew became involved in covering up the actions of Morey Haber. This information and the e-mails Razimus received are what have casted doubt in my belief that John Titor is real. And you know what?  In the back of my mind, I knew it all along. The Haber family was sticking out like a sore thumb this whole time, but because the story was romanticized, it was easy to overlook their involvement.

Am I embarrassed that I believed John Titor was real? No. Not in the least. We learn, grow, and change as time goes on. That is perfectly normal for any human being.   I am still a strong believer in time travel itself. My theory is that even if time travel is invented in 1000 years, it exists now because if someone can access our timeline, then the technology most certainly exists.

I cannot fathom time travel not existing in, let’s say, 3000 years. I believe it is inevitable. Current physicists would not be able to comprehend the technology of 3000 years into the future, so of course some of them may be skeptical. Scientists such as Kaku believe that type 0 civilizations cannot achieve time travel. Well, he is a type 0 scientist. Of course he believes that. But, jump into the future when this same civilization is a type 3. They WILL be able to time travel, in my humble opinion, and traveling to our time makes time travel itself even exist for us!

At any rate, I do plan on keeping my site up to explore more aspects of space and time travel and I will never forget the John Titor story and how it has impacted my life. Below is the video containing Razimus’ proof that Morey Haber is indeed the John Titor hoaxter.

Read More

Trump and 411 in BTTF2


Mysterious 411 in Back to the Future II
by PaulaJedi

Back to the Future is an incredible set of time travel movies produced by Stephen Spielberg. Many already know about the very credible and eerie theory that 9/11 was predicted in the first movie, and if you haven’t heard that theory, you can find it easily by searching with your favorite search engine.   I decided to take it upon myself to study these movies myself and take a few notes.  Although it is up to interpretation, I personally believe that Donald Trump’s presidency and some type of murder is predicted in Back to the Future II. After all, if the first movie made a prediction, why wouldn’t the other two?

First, I will reference the first movie. As I watched Back to the Future, enjoying it immensely might I add, I was looking for the 9/11 references but also found a few 411 references. In the very first scene, one of Doc’s devices has a red label that says 411. Later, Marty receives a phone number from Jennifer after camping and the clock tower says 10:04. Furthermore, if you take the date of November 5, 1955 that is mentioned throughout the movie, 9+5 = 14. If that isn’t enough for you, take note that the infamous lightning strike of the clock tower also occurred at 10:04pm, which is why it was stuck there to begin with. More 411’s.

Does this seem far- fetched? Let’s take a look at Back to the Future II. The first thing I noticed was the mall sign and clock in the beginning of the movie. The sign says Lone Pine Mall, due to timeline changes, and the time says 1:34. This may be pushing it a little, but 1+3=4, correct? It gets better. Again, I noticed the clock tower after Marty’s hover board adventure still stuck on the time of 10:04. Last, George McFly’s grave had the date of April 1, 1938. April = 4. 1+9 = 10. 3+8 = 11. There’s the 411. Last but not least, we must consider the Back to the Future II release date of November 22, 1989. November = 11. 2+2=4. 411. That concludes the 411’s I’ve found in both videos. Don’t be discouraged, because I noticed something pretty amazing.

In Back to the Future II, Biff becomes rich, runs a casino, etc. Does this remind you of someone? Did you notice his hair color? Two words. Donald Trump. Was Spielberg letting us know that Donald Trump was going to do something significant in our future? Is he going to win the 2016 presidency? Yes, it’s all up to interpretation, but I found this one pretty obvious. Now, how do we tie in 411 and Donald Trump? Is something going to happen on either April 11 or November 4 during his presidency? George McFly was murdered in this movie. Will someone important be murdered, or is that fact irrelevant? Is the name George significant? These are things I don’t know and can only speculate.

Back to the Future II also contains another mystery, the number 9. Two backwards 9’s appear in the smoke above the Delorean once in the movie and a hotel at the end of the movie contained the number 9. I do not know the significance of these, but Spielberg must have put them in for a reason.

Are the Back to the Future Movies more than just fascinatingly entertaining films? Was Spielberg instructed by someone to put these messages into the movies? I will let you decide. I’ve provided the evidence for my theory and videos concerning the number 9 and the first Back to the Future movie can be found by searching the web.  Consider this food for thought and tools for thinking. Does Hollywood know more than they let on?

Read More

Outta Time

Outta Time – Fringe Science and Time Travel News by PaulaJedi

Click here to subscribe and click a video below to watch.  These are listed from newest to oldest.



Read More

Life is Short


Life is Short
by PaulaJedi

Some of you may wonder what this blog has to do with science and time travel. After a bit if pondering, I came to the conclusion that life itself has absolutely everything to do with time travel. We are moving forward in time and doing so faster than most of us would like. With that thought, one has to comtemplate what little time we have left with our loved ones. Today, I was reminded.

I work for a charity thrift store. All of our proceeds directly help those in need with food, clothing, shelter, and other services. After my usual daily duties, I decided to help sort clothing when I heard a knock at the back door. When I opened it, a woman came to me in tears with a jewelry box. She said it was her mom’s, who I assumed died recently. She said this pair of earrings was really special and she wanted them to go to an older woman who would appreciate them. I told her I would buy them for my mother. She then gave me a hug. Personally, I think she should have kept them but maybe her mother wanted them donated. It was a moving, heartfelt moment at the thrift store. We get those once in a while.

I like to consider this event both a gift and a message from God. I think that by appreciating her mother, this woman reminded me to appreciate my own mother. I feel I  always have, but by giving her these special earrings, I am reminded that I have a wonderful mother that I will lose one day. It makes me both happy and sad at the same time. I am lucky to have an awesome mom, but none of us want to lose loved ones. So, please, by all means, hug your mother and father if you can. Embrace your children. Appreciate every decent person in your life. The river of time flows swiftly and stops for no one.

Read More

Outta Time

Check out my new Time Travel news show called Outta Time.  I am hoping to make new episodes every week.

Click here to subscribe to my channel.

Read More

Time Travel Institute is Back


Time Travel Institute, the infamous website where John Titor once posted, is back and is better than ever!  Under new management and now run by Cosmo, the site has grown to become lightning fast with sharp looking software and a friendly atmosphere.   Some of the topics you can discuss on TTI include General Time Travel, The Science of Time Travel, John Titor, Time Travel Urban Legends, and many more. Feel free to contribute your thoughts about Time Travel and enjoy the new layout and atmosphere.  Simply click here!

Tempus Edax Rerum.


Read More

Using Math for Time Travel


Using Math for Time Travel
by PaulaJedi

I am a believer that time travel is possible via math. What one does with the math, I can only guess, as I am not an engineer or scientist, but in my most humble opinion, I feel math proves time travel is possible. I will first refer to a quote by the infamous John Titor himself. In his original posts, John Titor stated the following when describing the physics of time travel:


Fortunately, most black holes are not static. They spin. Spinning black holes are often referred to as Kerr black holes. A Kerr black hole has two interesting properties. One, they have two event horizons and two, the singularity is not a point, it looks more like a donut. These odd properties also have a pronounced affect on the black hole’s gravity. There are vectors where you can approach the singularity without being crushed by gravity.” – John Titor

A donut shape, or torus, is mathematically possible, and when I show you an image of it, you will see that it looks exactly like a worm hole.


The following page will explain the math behind the torus shape. Please make particular note of the n-dimensional torus, I feel that this equation might possibly point to a way to travel to other dimensions.


Of course, many believe a wormhole looks more like this:


What I am proposing, based on John Titor’s statement, is that there is a torus on each end of the wormhole with their centers being elongated or stretched.  Or, if you look at one single torus, you can see the “old fashioned” image of a wormhole inside of it.  Refer to the rotating image above.

Another interesting thought on this page is the concept of an “inside out” torus.


It can be “punctured” to encourage it to flip.  Take a look at this animation, taken from the above website. Look what happens. One side of the torus, or wormhole, can reach the other side.  Does this mean, by using math and the proper technology, that we could potentially reach the other side of the worm hole without going THROUGH it? Could we possibly aggravate or puncture the worm hole, step in side the puncture, close it up, then travel to the other side and escape before it closes again? Another observation I have is that the double torus resembles the infinity symbol or two connecting petals of a rose curve. You may refer to my previous article about rose curves. Could multiple universes be connected via more than one torus or multiple worm holes?


If these toruses or wormholes do connect, then I see no reason why a time traveler could not travel from one universe to the next using math and the proper technology. Each torus could be mapped and marked. Each time a new universe is accessed, it can be added to the database and that location can be used to trace one’s steps back “home”.

Food for thought.  Are there any holes in my theories?

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus#/media/File:Double_torus_illustration.png

To discuss, please visit Paranormalis.

Read More

Gears Unseen


Gears Unseen
An Interview with Temporal Recon,
author of  Conviction of a Time Traveler

by PaulaJedi

Please Note: I no longer support Temporal Recon. My interviews will remain online as samples of my work and to leave up as historical documents.  

Time Traveler John Titor’s infamous 2015 has arrived and many people are waiting in anticipation to find out if the United States will indeed find itself under nuclear attack by the Russians, or instead, find that the concept of divergence has saved us all from this impending doom.  While we wait to find out our fate, perhaps we should revisit a previous interview by Temporal Recon, author of the John Titor related book Conviction of a Time Traveler.  Then, we can read about what else he has to say about time travel.  In the brand new interview below, Temporal Recon is offering us a new glimpse of his mind by speculating on many more topics including John Titor, time travel in general, and even aliens. If you’re ready to begin the journey, buckle up your seatbelts, sit back, and enjoy the ride.

Has your opinion of the authenticity of John Titor changed since you’ve written the book Conviction of a Time Traveler

In a word, no. My understanding of the larger question regarding ‘time travel’ has only deepened and expanded. Not to diminish Titor’s impact or importance, I have discovered that Titor was “merely” one example of the larger phenomenon (No offense, John!).

Where have you discovered these other examples? In the media? The movies? Can you provide any examples?

I am averse at highlighting particular examples, and for a variety of reasons.  Some make themselves known as time travelers while others do not.  They have a job to do and far be it from me to point the spot light of legitimacy upon them when they may not want it.  I simply don’t want to interfere in the work they are doing.

That being said, I will say that I am surprised at the sheer volume of their presence.  We are being visited, literally, all the time.

Do you believe the United States is preparing for martial law, if and when it is necessary? What evidence can you find to support this?

I make a conscious effort to actively avoid the nightly bad news on television, though I get some news online as a means to maintain a modicum of situational awareness. Any specific actions that the United States Government is or is not taking is unknown to me.

This does not make me cold or unfeeling to what I DO see is happening. I simply try to keep in mind, however, that everything we’re seeing, everything we’re experiencing and everything that angers us has already happened (from a future-history perspective).  My peace of mind is more important to me than the tempting addiction to anger and outrage that is fed to us daily. Admittedly, this outlook is a tightrope. Even I am surprised sometimes at what is happening and what is being attempted.

Do you believe that John Titor left messages in other places besides the internet?  Why or why not?  Where?

Thinking a bit larger, I would say this question and the one that immediately follows is a bit out of order.  Rather, I would ask, “do you believe that TT’ers in general leave messages elsewhere?”  and “do you think John Titor did this?”  The short answer is yes, to both questions.  As one example, are you discounting the likelihood that the faxes in 1998 to Art Bell were from Titor?

I was reviewing Conviction of a Time Traveler the other day and I noticed that I made an error:

In COATT,  I stated that the faxes were from an individual who claimed to be John Titor.  This was an error and I apologize for this oversight.  (Incredibly, nobody pointed this out in over 5 years).  The faxes were never signed (or Bell never gave the name if they were).  But the content of the faxes inexorably points to Titor.  Doesn’t this show that they do in fact interact via means other than the internet and before the internet age?

Do you believe other time travelers have done the same?

Nice to see that your question implies and acknowledges the existence of other time travelers out there.   There is a larger stage present with many actors.

Many people still say that none of John Titor’s predictions have come true. Which predictions do you believe actually have come true and how do you feel about using only predictions as proof of time travel, anyway?

A great question for its implications.

First of all, “many people” are simply wrong on many of their assertions.  I learned long ago that usually the single best source of information is my own research.  “Many People” are too often biased by their own assumptions, preconceptions and agendas to be a reliable source of insight or information.  This applies to both the Debunkers as well as the True Believers.  As a result I ignore “Many People.”

While you can look at the arrivals/departures board at an airport to discern a plane’s itinerary, it is not the sole source of truth and sometimes it can be erroneous. Just as an airliner leaves skid marks on the runway indicating landings taking place there, so do the actions of TT’ers leave similar traces.

That being said, the question of whether ‘time travel’ is real or not is largely answered in my mind so I don’t normally go out in search of the latest arrival to our humble little corner of the multi-verse.  There are larger questions to ask than to try to keep track of all the comings and goings.

Explain the concept of “gears” and how it relates to time travel.  Have any new “gears” made themselves known to you since you’ve written your book? 

There is a gif on my blog that shows a series of interlocking gears and all turning in concert.  In looking at those interlocking gears it is impossible to discern from whence the motive force comes.  Which gear is the source of power that turns all the others?  This is the underlying question as it pertains to the ‘time travel’ question.  What strings are being pulled? In what direction? Who is doing the pulling?  It is quite elementary to observe the moving gear, but figuring out why it’s moving is a wholly different question.

Another item that must be included in our calculus of the question is the accounting of the gears that exist but go unseen; that are hidden from view but are turning nonetheless.  In looking at the gif on the blog, one assumes he is seeing all the gears; that the full problem set is quantifiable.  If the time travel question has proven one thing to me, it is that the full picture is not known (either by me or the vast majority of those who profess interest in the topic).  There are gears (such as actors, events, motives) that are not readily observable, yet they exist nonetheless.

Regarding the article you shared about the Berenstain bears as well as my own experience with apparent changes in the timeline, do you now believe that humans can or will be able to pick and choose which timeline to visit, despite the seemingly strict rules of the Multiple Worldline Theory? After all, wouldn’t it just be a mathematical issue?

I am no mathematician, but I might ask, were that the case, then we would need to be able to calculate infinity +1.  Is that possible?

Why do you believe infinity +1 is the key to time travel?

Sorry, I believe I didn’t make myself clear here.

I did not mean that “infinity” is the key to time travel.  Rather, I meant that in order to travel to one world line out of an infinite quantity of world lines as you propose, the traveler would first have to quantify infinity.   Infinity, for all intents and purposes, is an imaginary number.  Any “number” per se is a quantity.  Infinity is not a quantity, it is a concept.  As a matter of fact, “infinity” could very well be described as the very inability to quantify at all.  So, returning to your original hypothesis of finding a way to travel to a particular “ZD” WL in an infinite sea of WL’s, you would first have to quantify the set {infinity} and then pick one out of that set. As before, I reserve the right to be wrong here.  Many do not ascribe the appropriate respect to the mathematical meaning of “infinite” and thus miss its true incomprehensibleness.

But do we know for certain that the universe and time are infinite? For one universe to be infinite, are we assuming it is infinite in both directions, like a line, are we not? What are your thoughts?

You are mixing apples and apple trees here, Paula.

I did not say that a universe (world line) is infinitely “long.” I said that it is reported (by TimeTravel_0) that the quantity of WL’s is infinite and is, by definition, unquantifiable.

I believe Titor did state that individual universes do indeed have specific beginnings and endings.

I would also caution against characterizing a universe as a “line.”  This characterization is an artifact of how we perceive moments in time (past then present then future).  A universe (with all its constituent dimensions) likely is much more akin to a bubble where all moments exist simultaneously.

But I do understand (and welcome) the ease that characterizing a worldline as a line offers, especially to the layman.  Just understand that calling it a line is merely a convention, not necessarily the actual truth.

My thought is that once we visit a particular universe, we will have the “map” or coordinates to revisit or even trace our steps backwards.  In your opinion, would this make returning to your home universe any more plausible?

Navigation is a very interesting topic and I welcome the discussion, though if I were to speculate and to answer your question, I would say likely no.

Firstly, can we be certain we can identify all possible dimensions (or at the very least even be aware of their existence) and their values that would be required to reliably describe any given universe in all its conditions? (A WL’s ‘coordinates’ as it were)

Putting the problem in terms of geographic coordinates, consider how we find ourselves on the globe right now: we use geographic coordinates where one series of numbers identifies a line of latitude and a second number identifies a line of longitude.  Where those two lines cross is a discreet and identifiable location on the globe; two dimensions.

When we talk about coordinates of a particular WL, all things being equal, we are faced with one primary and fundamental problem:  quantifying infinity (the globe, as it were).  Any means of identifying a particular world line such as how you hypothesize would necessarily be a relative position relative to all other world lines (and it would have to be all of them) just as all lines of latitude or longitude are relative to a specific datum (the Prime Meridian for example).  And if that quantity is constantly and infinitely changing (an infinite number of universes being created, existing and ending) then identifying one particular WL would be impossible because the datum would constantly and infinitely be changing (or at the very least, never fixed).

What is important to take away here is that this system only works when the total number of lines of longitude and latitude are fixed and permanent.  How would it be possible (for example) to go to the 56th degree of north latitude when the quantity of parallels (both north and south of it) is constantly in flux?

But this line of questions does highlight an interesting aspect of TT_0’s narrative.  He claimed his system could indeed describe a WL,  but only as it is

  1. relative to his origin WL, not relative to the totality of all universes within the multiverse and
  2. Taking it further, the technology doesn’t describe the WL’s location, but rather it’s ‘amount’ of difference from his original as measured by gravity.  This is key.

If the idea of divergence is a real one, then we can infer that measuring that divergence, and keeping it to a minimum, is of paramount importance in navigation and not necessarily the WL’s relative “location” within the infinitely mutable multiverse.

This hangs quite nicely with TT_0’s claims that returning to one’s own “home” universe is just as impossible.  He said himself that returning to his WL or “origin” was impossible (or at least so infinitely unlikely that renders the possibility impossible).  Remember: infinite means infinite.

So, in terms of navigation within the multiverse, minimizing divergence is likely a much larger factor than many might believe.  As a matter of fact, I am sure that divergence is the single largest factor when it comes to navigation through time (if divergence is a real thing in the first place).

Zero Divergence is mathematically possible. Is math sufficient evidence for proving that one day we can travel to whichever timeline we wish, and is it possible that John Titor was not being 100% truthful about this issue?

Traveling to whichever world line we wish seems to be an impossibility based on my answer above (though I reserve the right to be wrong on the matter).  Also, your question presumes that the number of universes ‘in existence’ is static and “stuck at infinity.”  This is likely not the case since new universes are created in every “moment” (if ‘moment’ is even definable).  Once one gets their head around that, then some semblance of awe takes hold when considering the true scope of what “infinite multi-verse” really means.

Getting to the second part of your question, I imagine John was as truthful as our own understanding allowed within the constraints of what he could and could not talk about.

Do you believe consciousness plays a role in time travel?

A simple question worthy of an encyclopedia’s worth of answer.  Yes, consciousness likely intersects with Time Travel.  I find consciousness to be the underpinning of reality itself.  Because of this, your question is phrased a little backwards.  Instead, perhaps it should be asked thusly:

Do I believe time travel implicates consciousness?

Again, the answer is yes (the transitive property holds here, haha).  It is my firm, experiential, understanding that the multi-verse is composed of consciousness running throughout it.  I might even be drawing a difference without a distinction.  Personally, I tend to think of consciousness as an information field. That field encompasses (and composes) all universes that exist (and have the possibility and probability to exist as probability waves or possibility waves).  Again, I reserve the right to be wrong.

So, if a time traveler is able to move from one universe to another, he likely comes into contact with the pure, unadulterated information field while “in transition” to a different WL. This is pure speculation on my part and I should be careful to not conflate speculation with my own research on the matter, but the theory seems to hang together nicely.

The results of this exposure could and likely results in psychological effects such as the Alter Vue experience.

For Example:

Consider a twig as representative of a single universe.  No branches, no junctions.  Just a simple, straight twig.

Now, consider a lake of water.  That lake represents the consciousness of everything in the multi-verse.

Place the twig in the lake.

That is how I perceive the confluence and interaction between a universe and consciousness.  The small ripples already present in the lake cause the twig to respond by bobbing up and down; Consciousness effecting observable (and quantum) reality.

Now, place another twig in the lake.  This near identical twig is a near identical twin of the other twig/universe, nearly equal in all respects to its neighbor.  You now have two twigs floating in the lake of consciousness.

If you were to tap one twig floating in the water, it will cause ripples indicative and resulting from that tap.  Those ripples will eventually travel to the neighboring twig and cause it to bob in the water.

This bobbing of the second twig is a direct result of actions taken on a neighboring twig and transmitted to the other twig via “consciousness ripples.” Reality causing ripples in the information field.  This theorizes an interplay between the two.

This is my theory of the Alter Vue phenomenon.  The actions on one universe causing results in neighboring universes via the medium of consciousness.

I don’t believe I am breaking any new philosophical ground here, however.  Many before me have speculated on the same possibility outside of the TT question, but it applies nonetheless;  I am merely tying consciousness generally to the TT question specifically.

Out of the many aspects of the TT question, I find the Alter Vue phenomenon the most indicative of the larger scale of reality itself.  It points to a larger context and implies that there is a great deal we do not yet understand about the reality we inhabit.  “Traces of rubber on the runway” as it were.

I’m certain Copernicus would likely be rolling in his grave to learn his was but a very superficial description of a more-than-just-mechanistic universe.  There is a ghost in the Grand Machine.

Do you therefore believe in a global consciousness or is Earth simply a small portion, or a twig as you say, of the universal consciousness you described?

Of course. That ‘twig’ is resting on the surface of the lake, after all.  And that global consciousness is/must be connected to a larger universal consciousness which is then also connected to that underlying lake, the consciousness that allows information to pass between universes.  Again, this is speculation on my part, but informed speculation nonetheless

Do you believe that the “information field” of consciousness can be accessed by human beings?

If the information field exists as I believe it does, yes.  I would wager that we are never separate from it.  It is likely the water in which we swim.

Obviously, aliens must rely on time travel to reach our planet in a relatively timely manner (no pun intended).  Do you also agree that time travel plays a huge role in UFO phenomena? 


I have written on the overlap of the UFO and TT question before in my essay entitled “Bending Gravity, Everybody Does it…”.  This essay highlighted the apparent confluence of the technology of bending gravity between the UFO and TT questions. I had no idea it was such an obvious connection to make (just teasing you a little, Paula).

I would clarify that your question presupposes that the UFOs and their occupants are ‘time traveling’ to reach us.  This was not the thrust of the essay and my current understanding, though I respect your own interpretation. Rather, that the UFO pilots are using similar technology that is also employed in TT.  A subtle distinction, but take it for what it’s worth.  Also, your question presupposes and assumes that physical travel is required to accomplish all of their aims, which is not necessarily the case.

Are you inferring that even UFO sightings may not actually be physical?

Not necessarily, but there is evidence to show that not all UFO sightings or experiences are, in fact, physical in nature.

Are the topics of time travel and UFO’s intertwined?

I believe so, yes.  At the technology level at least. See above.

Could some aliens be evolved human beings visiting ourselves from the future?  What are your thoughts?

How do you define human?  If in the next 2 million years we theoretically evolve out of the Homo Sapien Sapien species (a species so nice they named it twice) to a different species (Homo Sapien Proximus?  Homo Sapien Augustus?) then are they still Human by our current definition?  By this argument, and if the theory of evolution is true, then doesn’t that make gibbons human as well?

But to your question, yes, I suppose this is possible.

I wonder, has anyone considered what could be so darn interesting to Homo Augustus 2 million years into our future that would require them to visit us here/now?  Don’t they have more interesting problems to investigate? If you had a time/space machine, would you go back to Earth?  In 2 million years of TT effort and historical investigations, what else could there be to learn? Is there nothing more interesting in the infinite multi-verse than telling the inhabitants who wins an election?

What interesting and pressing problem do they find so interesting and pressing here and now that it requires their attention, even 2 million years into the future???  This sovereign question alone makes one believe that we are living in interesting times, but perhaps not for the reasons that might be readily observable to us now.

Wouldn’t warping space technically involve time as well since one would be pulling time towards him or herself? (Little bit of a Star Trek reference here).

The overlap I have discerned between the UFO question and the TT question rests at the technological level, not its application.  What I mean by this is that it appears, from all known reports on the matters, that the manipulation of gravity as a technology is common to both applications (interstellar travel and “inter-universal” travel, to coin a term).

One could make the comparison to cars versus chain saws.  Both technologies make use of the same principles of internal combustion, but apply it towards completely different ends and in completely different arenas (transportation vs logging). Just because we note the commonality in underlying technology does not mean we use Volkswagens to chop down trees.

The same appears to exist between two other arenas: The UFO question and the “Time Travel” question.  They both have a similar underlying technology though the application of said technology (the manipulation of gravity) appears to be different.

I am merely highlighting the commonality and attempting to unite two questions that have heretofore been separate.

There is an interesting corollary that can be inferred from this as well and tied back to the John Titor story, albeit a speculative one.  That is the idea that the manipulation of gravity and its application in either of these arenas is the ‘state of the art.’  According to reports, which is all we have at the moment, this technology apparently has not been improved upon anywhere/when.

Don’t you find it interesting that, if TT were invented in Tampa in 2036 as TimeTravel_0 claimed, that humanity got it correct right out of the gate?  And that that technique has not been improved upon by any civilization with which we have been in contact, anywhere/when?  If that’s the case, perhaps we don’t give ourselves enough credit for our ingenuity? Or perhaps there’s more to the ‘history’ of time travel tech?

Do we know for certain that John Titor is truly from Earth? Think, for a moment, about the implications involved if Titor came from another planet.  How do you believe this changes the entire John Titor story? 

Your question presumes that humans are the only race native to earth that would/could travel through time and traverse the multi-verse. I have no information to the contrary, but let’s acknowledge our assumptions where we find them.  And considering no one physically examined Titor and reported back on the original forums, then yes, this is always a possibility that Titor was not human (by our current definition) and/or from a different planet.  In a spectrum of possibilities, this is one, yes.

If that were the case, my original question comes back to the fore:  What is so interesting that out of a near infinite number of worlds to visit, what makes this one at this time so interesting that they would expend blood and treasure to visit it?

Re-reading that last paragraph, I see an irony: Usually the argument against time travel is “If time travel is real, where are all the time travelers?”  I am explicitly stating the exact opposite, “because time travel is real, why is here/now so damn interesting that there are so many time travelers visiting us?”

Are you referring to the possibility that other types of humanoids lived here before we did and that current humanity could be alien hybrids?

I’ll attempt to answer your question with my own questions on the topic.

As a scene setter, when people discuss long lost civilizations, people invariably ask, “if they lived so long on this planet, where is all their technology and ruins left over from their time here?  Surely we would find something of theirs besides shaped rocks?  Why haven’t we discovered ancient fiber optic cables or computer chips?”

Setting aside for a moment that an ancient civilization solved technological problems the same way we do (using fiber optics or computer chips), many who ask these questions simply do not appreciate the sheer age of the planet (at current estimates).

Take for example plastic.  Conventional Wisdom is that plastic is extremely long lived and how it is the bane of the environment.  Fair enough.  Just doing a quick search on the internet, plastic is estimated to decompose from between 500-1000 years (all things being equal and in very general terms).

This means that if a civilization existed 10,000 years ago, and their civilization was built entirely of plastic, there would be literally zero direct trace of their existence at all.  But the premise states that the civilization existed.  Just because we cannot see their remains does not mean they didn’t exist.  The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.  

Take another example: nuclear waste.  Uranium 234 has a half-life of 245,000 years.  This means that U234 will lose ½ of its radioactivity every 245,000 years.  Quite impressive, no?  Looks like that’s going to be around for a very long time.

Doing some very quick computations, given a starting point of 500 Becquerels of radiation, it will take 17 ‘generations’ (245,000 each) for the radioactivity to reach .007 Becquerels.  This means that U234 will essentially lose all of its radioactivity in 4.2 million years.  4 million years is also a very long time.

But relative to the existence of Earth, it loses its impressiveness.

The earth is currently estimated to be 4.5 billion years old.  If we arbitrarily exclude the first billion years to allow for the earth to form and cool to such a point that life may exist upon it (life as we know it of course), this still leaves 3.5 billion years of history to account for. three and a half billion.

This means that U234 would have lost its radioactivity over 800 times by the time we measured it.

If U234 can be utterly lost to time (8 hundred times over) by the time we measure it, then what does that say about the hypothesized civilization that originally mined, refined and used it?

My point here is that the Earth’s age (as currently estimated) leaves a lot of latitude for civilizations and their artifacts to rise, fall and decompose into oblivion and we would never be the wiser.

If that is the case, don’t you find it a little arrogant to believe that civilization “began” in the fertile crescent 2,000 years ago?  What was happening 2 billion years ago?  We’ll never know.

More of those unseen gears…

Do you personally believe in astral time travel and have you tried it? If so, what were the results of your effort?

Astral Travel is a bit mushy of a word.  I prefer to use simply “Out of Body” since it describes what is happening and not necessarily attempts to label the medium in which it occurs. Yes I have experienced it on a number of occasions.  In answer to your question, simply: “eye opening.”

Are you working on any other projects you’d like to share with us?

Thanks for asking. I no longer actively investigate the John Titor question per se; that has been answered to my own satisfaction, though I am always open to new gems that add to my understanding.

I now am looking more at the larger context in which the larger TT question resides, some of which I alluded to in my answers above.

If you could recommend a book about time travel to someone, what would it be and why?

You mean, besides Conviction of a Time Traveler?  haha.

In terms of reading TT for fun, I have to say that I haven’t read any TT books that weren’t directly connected to researching the topic (as counterintuitive as that may be).  That being said, a book called “Time Machines” by Nahin is a useful desk reference that I have made use of several times.  It is extremely comprehensive and was instrumental in my research several times.  I will say that he has captured some truth in it, though he was likely unaware of it.

 Do you plan on writing any more books?

I have considered updating Conviction of a Time Traveler to some small degree but simply have not had the time. There are some tweaks I’d like to make and fix some typos but it is fairly far down the list of my chores.

Be sure to check out Temporal Recon’s blog and to discuss, please visit Paranormalis.

Read More